The Provincial Letters
contributor: Eric Lease Morgan (Infomotions, Inc.)
creator: Pascal, Blaise
date: 0000-00-00
extent: 625520
format: text/plain
language: en
publisher: Eris Etext Project
rights: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/
source: 1
subject: father
subject: fathers
subject: god
subject: man
subject: grace
subject: entirely
subject: mistaken
subject: yesterday
subject: undeceived
subject: pascal
subject: blaise
subject: provincial
subject: letters
subject: western
subject: philosophy
type: text
local mirror: pascal-provincial-570.txt
concordance: http://infomotions.com/alex/cgi-bin/concordance.pl
plain html: pascal-provincial-570.htm
sort title: Provincial Letters, The
full text: 1657 THE PROVINCIAL LETTERS by Blaise Pascal translated by Thomas M'Crie LETTER I Paris, January 23, 1656 SIR, We were entirely mistaken. It was only yesterday that I was undeceived. Until that time I had laboured under the impression that the disputes in the Sorbonne were vastly important, and deeply affected the interests of religion. The frequent convocations of an assembly so illustrious as that of the Theological Faculty of Paris, attended by so many extraordinary and unprecedented circumstances, led one to form such high expectations that it was impossible to help coming to the conclusion that the subject was most extraordinary. You will be greatly surprised, however, when you learn from the following account the issue of this grand demonstration, which, having made myself perfectly master of the subject, I shall be able to tell you in very few words. Two questions, then, were brought under examination; the one a question of fact, the other a question of right. The question of fact consisted in ascertaining whether M. Arnauld was guilty of presumption, for having asserted in his second letter that he had carefully perused the book of Jansenius, and that he had not discovered the propositions condemned by the late pope; but that, nevertheless, as he condemned these propositions wherever they might occur, he condemned them in Jansenius, if they were really contained in that work. The question here was, if he could, without presumption, entertain a doubt that these propositions were in Jansenius, after the bishops had declared that they were. The matter having been brought before the Sorbonne, seventy-one doctors undertook his defence, maintaining that the only reply he could possibly give to the demands made upon him in so many publications, calling on him to say if he held that these propositions were in that book, was that he had not been able to find them, but that if they were in the book, he condemned them in the book. Some even went a step farther and prot…